This paper discusses the issue of corporate responsibility towards workers after termination of employment, the purpose of this study is to find out the company's responsibility for workers due to termination of employment and to find out the judge's consideration of the termination decision in the decision of the central Jakarta district court. This research is of the normative juridical type of research. The approach is the Act's approach (statue approach). The data source uses primary data, namely laws, secondary data from scientific books and journals containing the opinions of experts and legal experts, and tertiary data in the form of language dictionaries, legal dictionaries, and encyclopedias. The data collection technique in the form of secondary data is the verdict of the case. Termination of employment results in a dispute over rights and obligations between employers and workers, the company is obliged to fulfil workers' rights after termination according to Article 156 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower in the form of severance pay, employment award money, and rights reimbursement money. With this dispute, there are 2 ways to resolve it, namely, outside the court of industrial relations and through industrial justice. In the decision of the case in this study, the judge's consideration is to grant the plaintiff's lawsuit in part. Then the employer must fulfil the rights of workers as his responsibility for the termination of employment.