Senescence of Revenue Rule in Dawn of Globalization

  • Varnit Trivedi
  • Show Author Details
  • Varnit Trivedi

    Student at Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

  • img Save PDF

Abstract

This academic paper revolves around the primary principle of Revenue in Private International Law. Dicey and Morris, in their book “Conflict of Rules”, mention the revenue rule as Rule-3, which is, as established by English law, a rule that forbids a state's revenue authority from bringing a legal action in a foreign court to assert or impose its revenue, whether explicitly or implicitly. Dicey asserts that it is the tradition that a country's courts will not impose another country's penal or tax rules. The precedent for the law can be found in the case of Government of India v. Taylor. In this academic paper, we will delve further into this very rule of Private International Law and see its implications through various case laws and the modern conventions and treaties that will serve as a turning point in this rule in the upcoming times. Lastly, we shall look for case comments and conceptual implications to better understand and overall perspective of the principle.

Type

Research Paper

Information

International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 5, Issue 1, Page 144 - 158

DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.112451

Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © IJLMH 2021